The Downside Of Volunteers
By Kate | Permalink | 2 comments | May 13th, 2007 | TrackbackI was at first not sure what to make of this rather negative take on volunteers, which essentially says that many people volunteer because they are hard to employ, and others – or those same ones – may enjoy whatever power they come to wield in a volunteer position. As such, not only are they difficult to work with but they are also hard to get rid of; you can fire or “run out of funding” for a hired worker, but it’s harder to find a good reason to get rid of a volunteer.
First of all, this is directed more at standard “at home” volunteers than at those traveling to volunteer, and while I can see the overall point, and wouldn’t say it’s completely off base, I don’t think that these cases are common. However it does raise an important point about volunteering – by its nature, volunteers are often less accountable than paid workers. If they don’t show up, or don’t do a good job, that’s that. The cause – or other volunteers or staff – may suffer as a result, but if that’s not enough of an incentive to do well, then there probably isn’t another one.
Given this, why use volunteers at all? I suspect many organizations do find it more effective and perhaps even more cost-effective to hire qualified staff who are accountable for the work they do; they can train one staff member once as opposed to three or four volunteers separately – and then another three or four when those leave. But certainly volunteers who stick around and demonstrate their commitment make an enormous contribution, and short-term volunteers who show responsibility are also valuable.
Finally, I think there’s an important community aspect of volunteering: the community benefits when people living in a place make an effort to give back, even when it’s just over the course of a few hours a week. The organization they volunteer for and the cause that benefits is not just an organization doing work, it becomes a part of the community – and this is important for the sustainability or “lastingness” of the work as a whole.
Comments
Thanks for your comment. I think it’s a good point you make - it’s just that it’s hard to apply rigorous standards to someone who is donating their time and to say “Please stop coming here for free” or something, if that makes sense I don’t think it becomes a necessity often thought…
Post your comment
If you have not commented here before, please take a moment to peruse ourCommenting Guidelines.
Travel Resources
- RTW Ticket Quote
- Cheap Hotels
- Cheap International Flights
- Medical Evacuation Insurance
- Student Travel Forum
- Waterproof cameras
Volunteer Travel Guide
Monthly Archives
BootsnAll Logues
TRAVEL THEMES
DESTINATIONS
SPORTS
i believe that if a volunteer is not anymore doing an excellent a job then let him go. it only means it’s not his calling…